Legal Opinion

HEATH v. GUARDIAN INTERLOCK NETWORK, INC.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 23, 2016No. 114,023PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, J.;

T1 The dispositive issue presented 1 is whether the $25.00 monthly maintenance fee limitation set forth in 47 O.S8. Supp. 2013 § 6-212.3 2 for an interlock device installed in vehicles, precludes the collection of lease/rental fees, taxes, and insurance/damage waiver fees, etc. in excess of $25.00. We hold that the $25.00 maintenance fee cap set forth in 47 0.8. Supp. 2018 § 6-212.8 does not preclude the collection of other fees such as rental fees, taxes, or msurance/damage waiver fees, etc.

FACTS ~

2 On July 18, 2012, the plaintiff/appellant, Nathan Heath (Heath/driver) was…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Fuller v. OdomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  4. United States v. Justin Rone, United States of America v. Roy Dupont LittleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  5. Keating v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. THURSTON v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSUR. CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  2. TOCH, LLC v. CITY OF TULSASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  3. Logan County Conservation District v. Pleasant Oaks Homeowners Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  4. TOCH, LLC v. CITY OF TULSASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  5. BROOKE v. REEDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API