Legal Opinion
Davidson v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 30, 2005No. 04-553 CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAMICH, Chief Judge.
Ethel Davidson (hereinafter “Plaintiff’) filed her complaint on April 2, 2004, alleging that the United States (hereinafter “Defendant”) failed to pay her the maximum coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (“SBP”) that her late husband elected to provide for her pursuant to 10 U.S.C. §§ 1447-55. Compl. 11116, 9.
Initially, the parties agreed to work together to resolve the issues in the complaint, and Defendant voluntarily provided an accounting of Plaintiffs survivor benefits for her review. To allow time for these efforts, the case was stayed until December 22,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Alder Terrace, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Jimmie Ann Taylor, Ladell Vasicek, Noma Chriss, Martha Cole, and Sara M. McCarthy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Roland Spruill v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Jewell M. Hart v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dalles Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Park Properties Assocs., L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Landers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006