Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Eagle Insurance & Morel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 11, 1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: On March 26, 1991, petitioner received notice that respondent was seeking uninsured motorist benefits. Five and a half months later, respondent demanded arbitration of his claim. By petition served September 25, 1991, petitioner commenced the instant proceeding to stay arbitration on the ground that the uninsured motorist endorsement of the policy excludes coverage of an insured who sustains injury "while operating an automobile in violation of an order of suspension.”
Supreme Court erred in granting the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hartford Insurance v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- In re the Arbitration between Allcity Insurance & JimenezNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. SteinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Kramer v. Interboro Mutual Indemnity InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- In re the Arbitration between State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance & MerrillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Taradena v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Nuzzo v. Griffin Technology Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Waskiewicz v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Eagle Insurance v. PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994