Legal Opinion

Waskiewicz v. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 8, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and judgment granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: *945Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. The court erred, however, in granting defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment insofar as it sought dismissal of the complaint and in failing to declare the rights of the parties (see, Pless v Town of Royalton, 185 AD2d 659, 660, affd 81 NY2d 1047). We therefore modify the judgment by denying defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment insofar as it sought dismissal of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Zappone v. Home InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Pless v. Town of RoyaltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Pless v. Town of RoyaltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Taradena v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Presbyterian Hospital v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Greenidge v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  2. Ranieri v. ArgustAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API