Legal Opinion

Starbucks Corp. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 2011No. G043650PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IKOLA, J.

Can a purported remedy cause the very disease it is supposed to prevent? In this so-called “headless” class action, the answer regrettably is yes.

During the first administration of Governor Edmund G. Brown, Jr., in the mid-1970’s, the California Legislature reformed the state’s marijuana laws to require the “destruction” by “permanent obliteration” of all records of minor marijuana convictions that were more than two years old. Employers were prohibited from even asking about such convictions on their job applications, with statutory penalties of the greater of actual damages,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Britt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School District v. MannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Hooper v. DeukmejianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Parris v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pirjada v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API