Legal Opinion
State v. Anez
Hancock County Court of Common Pleas
Decided June 16, 2000No. 99-167-CRPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Reginald J. Routson, Judge.
Procedural History
This matter came on for consideration by the court pursuant to a motion to suppress, or, in the alternative, motion in limine, filed by the defendant on January 4, 2000. In response thereto, the state of Ohio filed a memorandum in opposition to the defendant’s motion to suppress on February 1, 2000. The matter came on for an evidentiary hearing on March 15, 2000, and again on April 13, 2000. At the conclusion of the April 13, 2000 hearing, the court afforded both parties until April 28, 2000 to file supplemental memoranda. Neither party did so.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. AlbaughOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. HallOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. MarcumOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. Reece, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fifth District, Delaware County2018
- State v. MacklinOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.