Legal Opinion
State v. Reece
Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fifth District, Delaware County
Decided January 11, 2018No. 17 CAC 03 0019PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
{¶ 1} Appellant, Christopher Reece, appeals from the Municipal Court of Delaware County's December 28, 2016 decision that the arresting officer was justified in conducting field sobriety tests because the evidence supported a finding of reasonable suspicion that the appellant was driving while impaired. Appellee is the State of Ohio.
STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
{¶ 2} On August 26, 2016, at approximately 1:46 a.m., appellant left a bar on Sancus Boulevard after consuming a "couple" beers, and made a very wide right turn into the leftmost lane of Sancus Boulevard heading southbound.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- State v. FanningOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. BoboOhio Supreme Court · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BerryOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. YacobucciOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. DoeringOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
- State v. MetsOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- State v. SuchOhio Court of Appeals · 2018