Legal Opinion
Carlile v. Continental Oil Company
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided April 17, 1970No. 373PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SPIESS, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint in a personal injury action. The action was brought by plaintiff, Carlile, against defendants, Continental Oil Company (Continental) and X-Pert Well Service, Inc. (X-Pert). Carlile’s injuries resulted from a fire which occurred near an oil well owned by Continental. When the fire occurred Carlile, an employee of Hobbs Fishing Tools, was performing certain work relating to the well.
At the conclusion of plaintiff’s case in a non jury trial, the court sustained a motion by defendants to dismiss the action…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- White v. City of LovingtonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967
- Schloemer v. UhlenhoppSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
- Alford v. DrumNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- COSTAL PLAINS OIL COMPANY v. DouglasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Nassif Realty Corp. v. National Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. MaiOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Juneau v. Intel Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. HerreraNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.