Gliddon v. Goos

This is a suit to revive a judgment.

The defendant, by bis counsel, filed a peremptory exception, alleging that plaintiffs have no cause of action because the plaintiffs do not aver that they are the owners of the judgment sought to ho revived, nor that defendant is indebted to them. He further excepts that no authority is shown in John S. Walton, who, in the petition, nurports to act as the agent of the other plaintiffs.

The exception we think was correctly overruled.

The petition, in respect to the parties named as plaintiffs, is to some extent indistinct, but it is sufficiently clear who are…