Troppman v. Weigart
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Motion by the respondent, Appolonia Weigart, to dismiss the appeal of George Troppman from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of the county of Erie, entered in said Surrogate’s Court on the 10th day of August, 1910.
1Opinion of the Court
Robson, J. :
The amended decree of the Surrogate’s Court, of which appellant, George Troppman, seeks a review on this appeal, among other things judicially settled the accounts of Franciska Hourt, as the administratrix of the estate of George Heldmann, deceased, adjudged that deceased left an estate of inheritance, that Appolonia Weigart was “ the- only hem at law” of deceased, and directed the administratrix to pay forthwith the balance of the estate, the amount of which was fixed and determined thereby, to the attorney in fact of the said Appolonia Weigart. As stated in the opinion of this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Guarantee Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Philadelphia, Reading & New England RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Kelly v. . SheehanNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Falker v. New York, West Shore & Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
- In re the Estate of HeldmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
3Cited by4 opinions
- Anthony v. SchofieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Baca v. CatronNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1917
- Commercial Credit Co. v. CummingsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
- Commercial Credit Co. v. CummingsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929