Legal Opinion

Jamal v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 9, 1988No. 2877 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

The Department of Corrections (Department) preliminarily objects to Mumia Abu Jamals (Jamal) petition for review.

We discern the following from Jamals pro se petition. The Departments Publications Review Committee disapproved his receipt of a weekly newspaper, The Revolutionary Worker, during his incarceration at the State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon. Jamal further avers that he exhausted his administrative remedy before the Departments Central Office Review Committee, which upheld the decision.

Jamals petition does not challenge the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bronson v. Commonwealth Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Gary Dukes and Thomas E. Barber, D/B/A D & B Dozer Service v. South Carolina Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  3. Raitport v. Provident National BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Mueller v. PA. STATE POLICE HDQTRS.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Sever v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Weaver v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Buehl v. BeardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Dillon v. City of ErieCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Richman v. MositesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. A.D. Brown v. M. ZakenCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API