Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Carmichael

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 3, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

Marshall Carmichael appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed following his conviction on four counts of aggravated assault, two counts of violating the Uniform Firearms Act (VUFA), and one count each of conspiracy, possession of an instrument of crime (PIC), and recklessly endangering another person (REAP). He asks us to determine whether it was proper for the sentencing court to impose a sentence in which each of his aggravated ■ assault convictions were subject to a deadly weapon enhancement, even though those convictions arose out of the same shooting incident. Because…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. UrrutiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. LawsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. MinottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. ScullinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. CarmichaelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. CarmichaelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API