STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. MAURICE D. JONES
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDon E. Burrell, J.
Maurice D. Jones (“Defendant”} appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, for first-degree assault and armed criminal action perpetrated against a male victim. See sections 565.050 and 571.015. 1 Defendant claims he should receive a new trial because the trial court clearly erred in overruling his gender-based Batson 2 challenges to two peremptory strikes used by the State to eliminate female panel members. Deferring to the trial court’s superi- or position to detect bias, we find no clear error and affirm.
Standard of Review and Governing Law
A party may not exercise a peremptory strike…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Miller-El v. DretkeSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. EdwardsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. EdwardsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Com. v. Edwards, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018