Legal Opinion

STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. MAURICE D. JONES

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 2015No. SD33318PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDon E. Burrell, J.

Maurice D. Jones (“Defendant”} appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, for first-degree assault and armed criminal action perpetrated against a male victim. See sections 565.050 and 571.015. 1 Defendant claims he should receive a new trial because the trial court clearly erred in overruling his gender-based Batson 2 challenges to two peremptory strikes used by the State to eliminate female panel members. Deferring to the trial court’s superi- or position to detect bias, we find no clear error and affirm.

Standard of Review and Governing Law

A party may not exercise a peremptory strike…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Miller-El v. DretkeSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EdwardsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Commonwealth v. EdwardsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Com. v. Edwards, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API