Legal Opinion

State v. . Cannon

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 16, 1947PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

It is conceded that the defendant’s right of appeal, G. S., 15-180, and his right to have the case made up, or a postea properly prepared, G. S., 1-282, 1-283, are not to be abridged, except through his own fault or laches. S. v. Moore, 210 N. C., 686, 188 S. E., 421. Here, however, the Attorney-General is asking that the exceptions and objections filed by the solicitor (and later abandoned by him) be withdrawn and thus leave the defendant’s statement as the case on appeal. This accords with the decisions on the subject. Drake v. Connelly, 107 N. C., 463, 12 S. E., 251; Parker v. Coggins, 116…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. State Ex Rel. Drake v. ConnellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Parker v. CogginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  4. Ridley v. Seaboard & Roanoke RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  5. Metcalfe v. Chambers & Weaver Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. LucasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. State v. SailorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Respass v. BonnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API