Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Zaransky v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 10, 1938No. Gen. No. 39,807PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely

Plaintiff, by a petition for mandamus, asked that defendants be commanded to issue to him a retail junk dealer’s license for the year 1937, as provided for in sections 3710, 3711 and 3712 of the Revised Chicago Code, 1931. The trial court denied the petition and plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff alleges that he was engaged in the retail junk dealer business at 5825 South State street in Chicago; that he made application for the license January 27, 1937, for the year 1937, and had complied with all the ordinance requirements, and that defendants refused to issue the license.

Sec. 3710 of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Swift v. People ex rel. PowersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  2. The People v. ZaranskyIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Audia v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wes Ward Enterprises, Ltd. v. AndrewsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  2. Roth v. DaleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  3. People Ex Rel. Pielet Bros. v. Village of McCookAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API