Legal Opinion

People v. Beaugez

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 5, 1965No. Crim. 3560PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.

Defendants were convicted by a jury under an indictment charging them with “endangering the life or limb of a child, a violation of Section 273a of the Penal Code of the State of California, in that on or about the 28th day of October, 1963 . . . they were the persons who wilfully permitted a child, to wit: Jerry E. Beaugez, Jr., age 5 months, to be placed in such situation that its life or limb might be endangered.’’ The trial court denied defendants’ motion for a new trial and thereafter ordered that both defendants be granted probation for a period of three years, judgment and sentence…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Sorenson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. People v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. People v. HeitzmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. People v. PeabodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API