Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Yang

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 11, 2001No. A01A0392, A01A0393PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

Claiming Jan Yang had failed to keep a promise to give Ron Williamson five percent of a newly formed company (Enzymatic Deinking Technologies or “EDT”), Williamson sued Yang and EDT in five counts to obtain the promised ownership shares or to recover damages. The counts were stated as claims for trover, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, an accounting, and attorney fees. The court directed a verdict in EDT’s favor on all counts and in Yang’s favor on all counts excepting breach of contract. The jury found in Yang’s favor on the breach of contract count, and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jones v. SpindelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Carden v. BurckhalterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1324 v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  4. Ellington v. Tolar Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  5. Dyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kirkland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  2. Corey v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. Kilburn v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API