Legal Opinion

Ellington v. Tolar Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 18, 1977No. 53668PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Presiding Judge.

1. The appellant does not attack the substantive merits of the summary judgment granted to the appellee; he does however attack the procedure by which that motion was brought and acted upon by the trial judge. We are cited to Summer-Minter & Associates v. Giordano, 231 Ga. 601 (203 SE2d 173) for the proposition that having once made a motion for summary judgment and lost, the appellee is precluded from again making such a motion after an appellate court affirms the denial. ".. .[S]ummary judgment is a decision upon the merits of the case, and *220once a final ruling is made…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Summer-Minter & Associates, Inc. v. GiordanoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  2. Wardell v. Richmond Screw Anchor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  3. Keller Building Products of Atlanta, Inc. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Ansley v. Atlanta Suburbia Estates, Ltd.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1974

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Gutierrez v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Premium Distributing Co. v. National Distributing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Fierer v. AsheCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Leader National Insurance v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Andrulonis v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API