Legal Opinion

Ross v. Conway

California Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1892No. 13341PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The plaintiff, as the sole heir of his mother, Elizabeth G. Ross, brought this action to cancel and annul two certain deeds of trust conveying certain real estate in Santa Rosa, executed by his mother, August 11, 1888, and August 18, 1888, respectively, alleging that at the time of their execution his mother was weak in body and that her mind was impaired, and that the defendant Conway, who was the pastor of the Roman Catholic church of Santa Rosa, of which she had been for many years a member, and who was also her spiritual adviser, had thereby acquired great influence over her, and, taking…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Richmond Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  2. Ford v. HennessySupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  3. In re WelshNew York Surrogate's Court · 1849
  4. Connor v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Herbert v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. In Re Wood EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Cox v. SchnerrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Jenkins v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API