Eugene S. Ballin & Co. v. M. Ferst & Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Practice in the Supreme Court. Equity. Practice in the Superior Court. Bankrupt. Injunction. Receiver. Debt- or and creditor. Principal and agent. Discovery. Partnership. Costs. Before Judge Tompkins. Chatham Superior Court.
Read the full summary
Practice in the Supreme Court. Equity. Practice in the Superior Court. Bankrupt. Injunction. Receiver. Debt- or and creditor. Principal and agent. Discovery. Partnership. Costs. Before Judge Tompkins. Chatham Superior Court. February .Term, 1875. On October 12th, 1874, M. Ferst & Company, and other creditors of H. Mayer & Company, a firm engaged in banking in the city of Savannah, filed their bill alleging, in substance, as follows: The partners composing H. Mayer & Company are nonresidents of the state of Georgia. Said firm conducted a banking business in the city of Savannah through their…
1Opinion of the Court
Bleckley, Judge.
1. The trunk from which these four writs of error are offshoots or branches, is the bill in equity (still pending in the court below) filed by M. Ferst & Company et al. vs. Von Seybold et al. Exceptions were, in terms of the Code, entered pendente lite, at the complainants’ instance, to two rulings of the court, one admitting Ballin & Company, with two other firms, to become parties defendant, on their own motion, and the other refusing to dismiss the bill, as to these same defendants, on motion of the complainants. That these rulings might have been brought here by the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chairman of County Court ex rel. County Trustee v. SawyersTennessee Supreme Court · 1850
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sage v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Anding v. LevyMississippi Supreme Court · 1879
- Coca-Cola Co. v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Hodgkins v. MarshallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Orton v. MaddenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.