Legal Opinion

Myers v. Luzerne County

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Pennsylvania

Decided July 29, 1903No. 3PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Sur Petition of George W. Radford to Take Money out of Court.

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, District Judge.

On February 25, 1903, the plaintiff recovered a verdict in this case for $14,750, and the present controversy is over the ownership of one-half of it, which, on account of the conflicting claims thereto, the defendant has had leave to pay into court. Ownership is asserted on the one hand by the petitioner, George W. Radford, and on the other by George W. Myers, the plaintiff’s son. Both parties, though resident in Detroit, Mich., have submitted themselves to the jurisdiction of this court by petition, answer, and extended proofs going in to the entire merits, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morgan's Louisiana & Texas Railroad & Steamship Co. v. Texas Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Minnesota Co. v. St. Paul Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1865
  3. Rouse v. LetcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Havens & Geddes Co. v. PierekCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Healy v. RobinsonOhio Superior Court, Cincinnati · 1911
  2. In re JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Myers v. RadfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API