Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Pompa

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 21, 1989No. D007546PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENKE, J.

Following denial of a motion to suppress evidence and dismiss the information (Pen. Code, 1 §§ 1538.5 & 995), the court found Charles George Pompa guilty of possessing cocaine for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351). The court suspended imposition of sentence and placed him on three years’ probation, including a condition he serve one hundred eighty days in custody. Pompa appeals.

At approximately 5:15 p.m. on April 24, 1987, San Diego Police Officer Jerome Van Wey entered Pompa and Sons Upholstery with a search warrant. Before entering, the officers saw an “Open for Business”…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. DiazHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. MaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. People v. AguilarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. People v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. People v. MaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API