Legal Opinion

Bertrand v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 6, 2000No. 07-00-0033-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DON H. REAVIS, Justice.

Upon a plea of not guilty, appellant Richard R. Bertrand was convicted by a jury of aggravated sexual assault and after pleading true to two enhancements, punishment was assessed at 50 years confinement. By two issues, appellant contends 1) the trial court erred in failing to charge the jury on “mistake of fact,” and 2) trial counsel’s failure to preserve a key objection to the charge concerning “mistake of fact” denied him effective assistance of counsel. Based upon the rationale expressed herein, we affirm.

Because appellant does not challenge the sufficiency of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Willis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Bruno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Montgomery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
  5. Drakes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sands v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
  2. Bruce Peters v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
  3. Jimmy Jack Sands v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
  4. Ricky Lee Reyes v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2025
  5. Sands v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API