Legal Opinion
People v. Mudd
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 25, 2007PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), dated August 26, 2005, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
On January 9, 1995 the defendant, who had already been convicted of a felony in New York, pleaded guilty in the California Superior Court to robbery and forcible penetration. The convictions resulted from his sexual assault on a female victim, which included manual vaginal penetration. The defendant was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. GuamanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. InghilleriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. GirupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. MountAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. FiolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. MannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. ThurmondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- People v. Abdul-QawiyyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.