Medlin v. Rucks
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
LETTS, Chief Judge.
This appeal evolves from a non jury trial over a boundary dispute in Township 47 South Range 41 East, concerning the true location of the line supposedly delineating the South line of Section 13, the North line of Section 24 and the South line of certain tracts of the Florida Fruit Lands Company subdivision No. 2.
The trial court reserved ruling on a motion for a directed verdict by the defendants, but at the conclusion of the trial granted same upon the premise that the plaintiffs (the property owners to the North) had failed, by a preponderance of the evidence, to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Firestone v. FirestoneSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
- Watrous v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
- Shaw v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
- Hardee Trustees v. HortonSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
- King v. CardenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Beede Elegtrical Instrument Co. v. K.E.S., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Boston v. KesslerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983