Beede Elegtrical Instrument Co. v. K.E.S., Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
There is an implied warranty that a product will be suitable for the purpose for which it is purchased. When the evidence *60discloses that this is not the case, the purchaser has a right to recover his damages occasioned by the use of the product. Firestone v. Firestone, 263 So.2d 223 (Fla.1972); In Be Estate of Yohn, 238 So.2d 290 (Fla. 1970); Smith v. Burdine’s Inc., 144 Fla. 500, 198 So. 223 (1940); Medlin v. Rucks, 397 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Chrysler Corporation v. Miller, 310 So.2d 356 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Arcade Steam Laundry v. Bass, 159 So.2d 915 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964); Section…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Firestone v. FirestoneSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
- In Re Estate of YohnSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
- Smith, Et Vir v. Burdine's, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1940
- Arcade Steam Laundry v. BassDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Chrysler Corporation v. MillerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- RA Jones & Sons, Inc. v. HolmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985