Professionals and Patients for Customized Care v. Shalala
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WIENER, Circuit Judge:
In this challenge brought pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 1 Plaintiff-Appellant Professionals and Patients for Customized Care (P2C2) contends that the district court erred in concluding that Food & Drug Administration (FDA) Compliance Policy Guide 7132.16 (CPG 7132.16) is not a substantive rule and thus is not subject to the APA’s notice-and-comment requirement. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
In 1992, the FDA promulgated CPG 7132.16 to address what the agency perceived to be a burgeoning problem in the pharmaceutical…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Shalala v. Guernsey Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Richard A. Batterton, Secretary of Employment & Social Services of the State of Maryland v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Richard Pickus v. United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Texaco, Inc. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State of Texas v. USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Iowa League of Cities v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Koenig v. Boulder Brands, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- State of Texas v. USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Texas v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2015
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.