Legal Opinion

P & RO Solutions Group, Inc. v. CiM Maintenance, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided March 31, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16-CV-00095-RWSPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed claim terms in United States Patent No. 8,209,205 (“the ’205 Patent”). Aso before the Court is Defendant CiM Maintenance, Inc.’s (“CiM”) Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Docket No. 7). The Court held a Markman hearing on February 14, 2017 (Docket No. 60), and heard argument on CiM’s motion to dismiss on March 6, 2017 (Docket No. 72). For the reasons, discussed below, the Court resolves the claim-construction disputes as stated below…

2Cases cited26 opinions

Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Lime Green Lighting, LLC v. Brilliant NextGen Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2026