Legal Opinion

Blair v. National Reserve Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 31, 1935PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

This action is brought against a foreign insurance company upon a policy of fire insurance in the standard form prescribed by G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 175, § 99, to recover for the loss by fire of the plaintiff’s household furniture.

When the policy was issued the furniture was located on Huntington Avenue in Boston. Before the fire the plaintiff had moved it to Roslyn Place, where it was destroyed. The policy contained a condition that it should be void if the property should be removed without the assent in writing or in print of the company. There was no assent in writing or in print completed…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Insurance Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Bartlett v. StanchfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  4. Kyte v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  5. Friedman v. Orient InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Costonis v. Medford Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  2. Belbas v. New York Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Bogosian v. New York Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  4. Cooper v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  5. Smith Beverages, Inc. v. Metropolitan Casualty InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API