Legal Opinion

Helmsderfer v. Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided June 4, 2008No. 2008-1027PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs-Appellants, John A. Helms-derfer and Brocar Products, Inc. (collectively Brocar) appeal the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio holding that Defendants-Appellees, Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc., BWA South Company, Inc., Target Sales and Marketing, LLC, and Patterson Case Associates, Inc. (collectively Bobrick) did not infringe claims 6 and 7 of Brocar’s U.S. Patent No. 6,049,-928 (the '928 patent). We affirm.

BACKGROUND

The '928 patent is directed to baby diaper changing stations that are able to resist vandalism, for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
Verizon Services Corp. v. Vonage Holdings Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
Intel Corporation v. Via Technologies, Inc., a California Corporation, via Technologies, Inc., a Taiwan Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
K-2 Corporation v. Salomon S.A. And Salomon/north America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

3m Innovative Properties v. Tredegar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
SkinMedica, Inc. v. Histogen Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
Baran v. Medical Device Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
MySpace, Inc. v. GraphOn Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
Augme Technologies, Inc. v. Yahoo! Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.