Legal Opinion

Veiner v. Veiner

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 6, 1984No. 84-1426PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDRY, Judge.

Ms. Veiner appeals from a post-dissolution order of a successor trial court, pursuant to a remand from this court, which found that she was not entitled to a special equity award because there was no res to which it could be attached, all marital assets other than the marital home having been dissipated. We reverse.

It would serve no purpose to relate any but the most essential elements of the tortured history of this bitterly fought contest. The parties were married for 19 years. There were four children, the last of which has now reached his majority. Appellee obtained his…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Ball v. BallSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  3. Duncan v. DuncanSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  4. Yandell v. YandellSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
  5. Firestone v. FirestoneSupreme Court of Florida · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Devon-Aire Villas Home. v. Americable Assoc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Mobley v. MobleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  3. Kemmet v. KemmetDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API