State v. Allen
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
Where the trial court’s findings of fact support its conclusion of law that defendant was not in custody when he was treated in the hospital and answered questions posed by officers investigating the dispute in which he had been involved, the trial court properly denied his motion to suppress the statements. Where an officer merely stated the charges being brought against defendant after he had invoked his constitutional right to counsel, it is not an “interrogation” and the trial court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress any volunteered statements by defendant.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. GainesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- State v. GolphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. PortilloCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. HammondsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- State v. HinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. QuickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- State v. HammondsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.