Legal Opinion

Animal Welfare Institute v. Martin

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 20, 2010No. 09-2643PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYNCH, Chief Judge.

This is a case about the Canada lynx. The Endangered Species Act makes it unlawful to “take” a member of an endangered species. 16 U.S.C. § 1538(a)(1)(B). By regulation, it is also unlawful to “take” a “threatened” species, that is, one likely to become endangered in the foreseeable future. 16 U.S.C. § 1532(20); 50 C.F.R. § 17.31(a). The term “take” means to “harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect.” 16 U.S.C. § 1532(19).

The Canada lynx is a wild cat, weighing about 20 pounds, which eats small animals, particularly the snowshoe hare, and is…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. KG Urban Enterprises, LLC v. PatrickCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  2. Aransas Project v. Bryan ShawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  3. Verizon New England, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  4. Joyce v. Town of Dennis, MACourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  5. Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd. v. Commonwealth (In Re Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd. for Puerto Rico)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API