Animal Welfare Institute v. Martin
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LYNCH, Chief Judge.
This is a case about the Canada lynx. The Endangered Species Act makes it unlawful to “take” a member of an endangered species. 16 U.S.C. § 1538(a)(1)(B). By regulation, it is also unlawful to “take” a “threatened” species, that is, one likely to become endangered in the foreseeable future. 16 U.S.C. § 1532(20); 50 C.F.R. § 17.31(a). The term “take” means to “harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect.” 16 U.S.C. § 1532(19).
The Canada lynx is a wild cat, weighing about 20 pounds, which eats small animals, particularly the snowshoe hare, and is…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- KG Urban Enterprises, LLC v. PatrickCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Aransas Project v. Bryan ShawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Verizon New England, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Joyce v. Town of Dennis, MACourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd. v. Commonwealth (In Re Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd. for Puerto Rico)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.