Legal Opinion

State v. Proffitt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 24, 1997No. 75,791PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, C.J.:

Greg A. Proffitt was charged with operating a motor vehicle while his driving privileges had been revoked as a habitual violator pursuant to K.S.A. 1995 Supp. 8-287. The district court dismissed the complaint based upon what it termed “vagueness” in K.S.A. 1995 Supp. 8-288 as to how a habitual violator’s driving privileges could be restored. The State appeals-pursuant to K.S.A.- 22-3602(b)(l).

On November 23, 1991, the Reno County District Court had declared defendant to be a habitual violator. The statutory scheme in effect at the time,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. RoderickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  2. State v. AliresCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  3. State v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1993

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. KleypasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  2. State v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. State v. HeironimusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  4. State v. CreamerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2000
  5. Enslow v. Kansas Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API