State v. Heironimus
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Six, J.:
Defendant Bobbie L. Heironimus, declared a habitual violator (K.S.A. 1996 Supp. 8-286), was charged with operating a motor vehicle while his driving privileges were revoked (K.S.A. 1996 Supp. 8-287, a severity level 9, nonperson felony).
Our jurisdiction is under K.S.A. 22-3602(b)(l) (State’s appeal from a dismissal of the complaint). The issue is whether the ha bitual violator statutes (HVS), K.S.A. 8-284 et seq., are unconstitutional because they fail to provide due process.
We find the HVS constitutional and reverse the district court.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- MacKey v. MontrymSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dixon v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Manzanares v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Martin v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- State v. HittSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- State v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Creecy v. Kansas Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.