Legal Opinion

State v. Heironimus

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 11, 1997No. 77,733PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Six, J.:

Defendant Bobbie L. Heironimus, declared a habitual violator (K.S.A. 1996 Supp. 8-286), was charged with operating a motor vehicle while his driving privileges were revoked (K.S.A. 1996 Supp. 8-287, a severity level 9, nonperson felony).

Our jurisdiction is under K.S.A. 22-3602(b)(l) (State’s appeal from a dismissal of the complaint). The issue is whether the ha bitual violator statutes (HVS), K.S.A. 8-284 et seq., are unconstitutional because they fail to provide due process.

We find the HVS constitutional and reverse the district court.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. MacKey v. MontrymSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Dixon v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Manzanares v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Martin v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. State v. HittSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  3. State v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  4. State v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  5. Creecy v. Kansas Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API