Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Evens & Howard Sewer Pipe Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 1956No. 29295PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOUSER, Commissioner.

This is an action by Neal J. Campbell, a professional architect, to recover the reasonable value of services rendered by him in engineering, planning, drafting plans and specifications and procuring bids and estimates for the erection and construction of a dryer building for a sewer pipe company. A trial jury awarded plaintiff $6,500 but the trial judge set aside the verdict and judgment and granted a new trial. Plaintiff has appealed from that order.

The first question is whether the trial judge committed error in granting a new trial “on the ground that the court erred…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Maltz v. Jackoway-Katz Cap Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  2. Steele v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1915
  3. Conser v. Atchison, T. & SF Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  4. Dill v. Dallas County Farmers' Exchange No. 177Supreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  5. Stockton v. TesterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carvitto v. RyleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Food Management, Inc. v. Blue Ribbon Beef Pack, Inc., Blue Ribbon Beef Pack, Inc. v. Food Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  3. Scott v. NashMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Stanley Consultants, Inc. v. H. Kalicak Const. Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API