Shoemaker v. Harrington
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
This suit was instituted by the American National Insurance Company, seeking a determination of which of two rival claimants was entitled to benefits provided for in a life insurance policy issued by the company to appellant Hardy Shoemaker, in which his wife, Carrie A. Shoemaker, was made the beneficiary. Appellant and appellee E. L. Harrington, independent executor of the last will and testament of Mrs. Carrie A. Shoemaker, were duly interpleaded and made parties, and this appeal is from the judgment of the court disposing of the conflicting claims of the interpleaded parties.
We will not…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- New York Mutual Life Insurance v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Warnock v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Insurance Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Womack v. WomackTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Shoemaker v. American Nat. Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Fain v. FainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Cockrill v. Southwestern Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Fain v. FainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.