Legal Opinion

Shoemaker v. American Nat. Ins. Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1932No. 1322-5836PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShort, P. J.

While this suit was instituted by the defendant in error American National Insurance Company, impleading the plaintiff in error, Hardy Shoemaker, and E. L. Harrington, independent executor of the last will of Mrs. Caroline A. Shoemaker, upon the trial it developed that the insurance company had in its possession a sum of money, the amount of which is not in dispute, which the' insurance company was ready to pay to the rightful owner, but which was claimed both by the plaintiff in error, Hardy Shoemaker, and said executor. There is no statement of facts nor findings of fact by the trial court,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cheeves v. Anders, AdministratorTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Price v. Supreme Lodge Knights of HonorTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Schonfield v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  4. Whiteselle v. Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  5. Wilke v. FinnTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Berdoll v. BerdollCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. Fain v. FainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Mayo v. Hartford Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2002
  4. North River Insurance Co., New York, NY v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Foulks v. FoulksOhio Court of Appeals · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API