Legal Opinion

Hammer v. Investors Life Insurance Co. of North America

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 23, 1991No. CX-90-2386PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Investors Life Insurance Company of North America (appellant) appeals from a jury verdict finding that decedent insured did not make willful and intentional misrepresentations on a life insurance application. Appellant contends the trial court made erroneous evidentiary rulings, and further erred by submitting a question of law to the jury. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

FACTS

On October 9, 1985, respondent’s late husband applied for life insurance with appellant as the insurer. The application contained two questions which give rise to this appeal. Those questions…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Columbia Heights Motors, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark v. ViktoraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Howard v. Aid Ass'n for LutheransSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Rusciano v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hammer v. Investors Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Pappageorge v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API