Legal Opinion
Matarazzo v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 14, 1974No. 73-C-545PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARTELS, District Judge.
This is a motion under Rule 23(c)(1), F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C., for class action determination in a private antitrust action for treble damages brought by the plaintiff against the defendant pursuant to Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act and Sections 3, 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2, 14, 15 and 26), and also for injunctive relief, alleging class representation.
Defendant Friendly Ice Cream Corporation (“Friendly”) is a food processor and distributor of ice cream, hamburgers, frankfurters, soup and sandwiches and beverages through approximately 350…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Hall v. BealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brisco HUFF, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. N. D. CASS COMPANY OF ALABAMA, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Mersay v. First Republic Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Broussard v. Meineke Discount Muffler Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Robertson v. National Basketball AssociationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- AAMCO Automatic Transmissions, Inc. v. TayloeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Professional Adjusting Systems of America, Inc. v. General Adjustment Bureau, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Robbins Flooring, Inc. v. Federal Floors, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.