Legal Opinion
McNeil v. Canty
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided June 25, 2009No. SC08-2369Published
1Opinion of the Court
12 So.3d 215 (2009)
Walter A. McNEIL, etc., Petitioner,
v.
Edison CANTY, Respondent.
No. SC08-2369.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 25, 2009.
Carolyn J. Mosely, Attorney Supervisor, Office of General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, FL, for Petitioner.
Nicholas A. Shannin of Page, Eichenblatt, Bernbaum, and Bennett, P.A., Orlando, Florida, and William R. Ponall of Kirkconnell, Lindsey, Snure, and Yates, P.A., Winter Park, FL, for Respondent.
2Per curiam
We review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Canty v. McNeil, 995 So.2d 998 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008), a case in which the First…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Quince; Concurrence · Quince.
3Cases cited10 opinions
- NORTH FLA. WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- State v. RabedeauSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
- Evans v. SingletarySupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Moore v. PearsonSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Pearson v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.