Legal Opinion

Sybilrud v. Sybilrud

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 19, 1940No. 32,316PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Stone, Justice.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment that he was in contempt for failure to make the payments ordered in a suit for separate maintenance. The opinion on appeal in the latter suit (No. 32,315) is filed herewith. Sybilrud v. Sybilrud, 207 Minn. 371, 291 N. W. 606.

Unsound is the argument for defendant that under our statutes the district court has no authority to punish as for contempt the violation of an order directing the husband to make payments for the separate maintenance of his wife. We exclude from consideration 2 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 9793(3), providing for the punish…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barich v. BarichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Sybilrud v. SybilrudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dahl v. DahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API