Legal Opinion
Dahl v. Dahl
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 23, 1941No. Nos. 32,818, 32,846PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.. The defendant was found guilty of contempt for failure to obey an order directing him to pay plaintiff temporary alimony. To obtain a review he has appealed from the order and caused a writ of certiorari to be issued out of this court.
On September 9, 1940, plaintiff brought this action against defendant for separate maintenance. The court made an order on October 14 “that beginning the 12th day of September, 1940, the Defendant pay to the Plaintiff as temporary alimony the sum of Fifty ($50.00) Dollars per month payable on the 12th day of each and every month until the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wenger v. WengerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- State ex rel. Hurd v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- State ex rel. Wise v. JamisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Gulleson v. GullesonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Floyd v. WatsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
- Hempel v. HempelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- McKey v. McKeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949