Legal Opinion

Webster v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 27, 2003No. 2508, Sept. Term, 2001PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

In this appeal from a child sexual assault conviction, we must decide whether a four-year old victim’s description of the assault communicated to a nurse trained in Sexual Assault Forensic Examination (“SAFE”) was admissible under Md. Rule 5-803(b)(4), the hearsay exception covering statements made “for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment.” We shall hold that it was, even though there were dual medical and forensic purposes for the challenged statement.

FACTS AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On the evening of August 6, 1999, Evelyn Francis hosted a “safe sex” meeting sponsored by the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Danial Siebert v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Morgan v. ForetichCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  3. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  4. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. Beahm v. ShortallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. PayneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Fields v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. State v. ChristensenIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Coates v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Griner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API