Legal Opinion

Denicolo v. Viking Client Services, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 30, 2020No. 4:19-cv-00210Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 RONALD G. DENICOLO, ET AL., CASE NO. 19-cv-00210-YGR 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION OF DEFENDANT VIKING FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10 vs. Dkt. No. 105 11 THE HERTZ CORPORATION, ET AL., 12 Defendants. 13 14 On January 11, 2019, plaintiff Ronald G. DeNicolo, Jr. filed this putative class action 15 complaint against Viking Client Services, LLC, d/b/a Viking Billing Service (“Viking”) and The 16 Hertz Corporation (“Hertz”). On October 14, 2019, plaintiff Fox was added by an amended 17 Complaint. DeNicolo alleges four…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Shakur v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Heintz v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Victoria Zetwick v. County of YoloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API