Legal Opinion
Hale v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
Decided October 13, 1965No. Docket Nos. 1395-63, 1396-63, 1401-63, 1403-63UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Herman M. Hale and Louberta M. Hale, et al. 1 v. Commissioner.
Hale v. Commissioner
Docket Nos. 1395-63, 1396-63, 1401-63, 1403-63.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1965-274; 1965 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 56; 24 T.C.M. (CCH) 1497; T.C.M. (RIA) 65274;
October 13, 1965
Paul Wyler, for the petitioners in Docket Nos. 1395-63 and 1396-63. Gilbert Dreyfuss and Douglas W. Argue, for the petitioners in Docket Nos. 1401-63, 1402-63 and 1403-63. Paul G. Wilson, for the respondent.
FAY
Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion
FAY, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies in the income tax of petitioners in the years…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Corn Products Refining Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Commissioner v. P. G. Lake, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Hort v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Watson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Foster v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1983
- Sol Diamond and Muriel Diamond v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- William G. Campbell Norma T. Campbell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- National Oil Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986