Legal Opinion

Harold Wapnick v. United States of America and U.S. Clearing Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 23, 1997No. 1367, Docket 96-6227PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Harold Wapnick, pro se, appeals from Judge Amoris order dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying his motions for a default judgment and to vacate the “judgment” of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). Wapnick claims that the IRS made an invalid jeopardy assessment against him upon his failure to pay income taxes for the years 1985, 1986, and 1987.

Challenges to jeopardy assessments by the IRS are governed by 26 U.S.C. § 7429. Section 7429 provides for judicial review by the district courts in general, § 7429(b)(2)(A), and by the United States Tax Court in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Susie Schuster, A/K/A Susie Schuster Translateur v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Donald E. Hiley and Ruth v. Hiley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. Carlos Zuluaga v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Murphy ex rel. Estate of Payne v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
  2. Sarunas Abraitis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. GellasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  4. Green v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2003
  5. Rae v. United States (In Re Rae)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API