Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Gellas
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 17, 1998No. 91 CIV. 6346(WCC)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CONNER, Senior District Judge.
Before the Court is defendant Robert Ain-binder’s motion to vacate a default judgment entered against him by plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). For the reasons discussed below, the motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
On September 20, 1991, the SEC commenced the above-captioned action against Ainbinder and his co-defendants. In its complaint, the SEC alleged, inter alia, that Ain-binder violated certain federal securities laws, rules, and regulations by fraudulently liquidating stocks through a clearing firm and wrongfully obtaining…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bankers Mortgage Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Jerome Schurr v. Austin Galleries of Illinois, Inc., A/K/A Austin Publishing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Albert A. Taft v. Donellan Jerome, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS & PUBLISHERSDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- New York Ex Rel. Spitzer v. Saint Francis HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- MARBURY LAW GROUP, PLLC v. CarlDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Latimore v. Denver Housing Authority (DHA) of the City and County of DenverDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2023
- Marbury Law Group, Pllc v. CarlDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011