Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Barry Miller Chevrolet, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 14, 1989No. 87-927PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from the defendants' partial summary judgment on five counts of a seven-count complaint. We affirm in part (as to the claims based on contract, false imprisonment, and outrageous conduct); reverse in part (as to the claim for malicious prosecution); and remand.

The appellant, Mark L. Goodwin, operated an automotive service business under the name Custom Automotive Design. This business involved the installation of "detail work," primarily custom striping, on automobiles. Goodwin allegedly entered into an oral agreement with Barry Miller Chevrolet, Inc. ("Miller"), to perform…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. American Road Serv. Co. v. InmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Fountain v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Jehle-Slauson Const. Co. v. Hood-Rich Architects and Consulting EngineersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Cutts v. American United Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Bates v. Jim Walter Resources, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Thomas v. BSE Indus. Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Continental Cas. Ins. Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Whitlow v. Bruno's Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. McMillian v. JohnsonDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1995
  5. Karrick v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API