Legal Opinion

Babcock v. Town of Erlanger

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided August 24, 1940No. 5:06-misc-00002PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWINFORD, District Judge.

The question presented for determination is the right of a third party to intervene under Rule 24, Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

The facts briefly are these:

The complainant, Reynolds and Company, entered into a written contract with the defendant, Town of Erlanger, to purchase water works bonds in the amount of $175,000. The contract was the usual contract of this character. The complainant, under the terms of the contract, advanced $41,000, less commissions, for the purpose of liquidating a "pre-existing obligation secured by a lien on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. In Re Engelhard & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Chandler & Price Co. v. Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Radford Iron Co. v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kentucky Home Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. DulingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
  2. Rhode Island Federation of Teachers, Afl-Cio v. John H. Norberg, Appeal of J. Fred LipkindCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  3. Slusarski v. United States Lines Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. United States v. 1,830.62 A. OF LAND IN BOTETOURT COUNTYDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1943
  5. True Gun-All Equipment Corp. v. Bishop International Engineering Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API