Babcock v. Town of Erlanger
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
SWINFORD, District Judge.
The question presented for determination is the right of a third party to intervene under Rule 24, Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.
The facts briefly are these:
The complainant, Reynolds and Company, entered into a written contract with the defendant, Town of Erlanger, to purchase water works bonds in the amount of $175,000. The contract was the usual contract of this character. The complainant, under the terms of the contract, advanced $41,000, less commissions, for the purpose of liquidating a "pre-existing obligation secured by a lien on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- In Re Engelhard & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Chandler & Price Co. v. Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Radford Iron Co. v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kentucky Home Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. DulingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
- Rhode Island Federation of Teachers, Afl-Cio v. John H. Norberg, Appeal of J. Fred LipkindCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Slusarski v. United States Lines Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- United States v. 1,830.62 A. OF LAND IN BOTETOURT COUNTYDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1943
- True Gun-All Equipment Corp. v. Bishop International Engineering Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.